Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Problem Description

In this example a straight cantilever beam, modeled with shell elements, is subjected to unit forces at the tip in the three orthogonal directions and unit moments at the tip about the three orthogonal directions, each in a different load case. The tip displacements in the direction of the load are compared with hand calculated results.

It is important to note that this example is an extreme case presented for testing and verification of the shell element. Shell elements are not in general intended for use in modeling a beam with a 2 to 1 depth-to-width ratio.

The basic geometry, properties and loading are as described in MacNeal and Harder 1985. The cantilever beam is 6 inches long, 0.2 inch wide parallel to the Z direction and 0.1 inch wide parallel to the Y direction. Five different models are created, each with a different mesh. Models A, B and C use a 6x1 mesh with rectangular-, trapezoidal- and parallelogram-shaped elements, respectively, as suggested in MacNeal and Harder 1985. Model D starts with the 6x1 rectangular mesh and then divides each rectangle into two triangles. Model E starts with the 6x1 rectangular mesh and then divides each rectangle into four triangles. The meshes used in models D and E are not included in MacNeal and Harder 1985.

Six load cases are created for each model. The six load cases apply a unit axial force, a unit in-plane force, a unit out-of-plane force, a unit twisting moment, a unit in-plane moment and a unit out-of-plane moment at the tip of the cantilever, respectively. The twisting moment is applied as a couple of Y direction forces. The in-plane moment is applied as a couple of X direction forces. The out-ofplane moment is applied as moments.

The independent solution is derived using elementary beam theory that assumes no local Poisson’s effect occurs at the support. The beam is modeled in this model to match this assumption. At the fixed end, joint 1 is restrained in the Ux, Uy, Uz and Rz degrees of freedom and joint 8 is restrained in the Ux, Uy and Rz degrees of freedom. Joint 8 is not restrained in the Uz degree of freedom to avoid imposing the unwanted local Poisson’s effect into the model. Also, when the beam is loaded with in-plane shear, an in-plane force equal to half the applied tip load is applied to joint 8 in the opposite direction of the tip load. This special load at joint 8 is applied to model the reaction without the Poisson’s effect.


             


Tested Features

  •  Membrane analysis using shell elements
  •  Plate bending analysis using shell elements
  •  Effect of shell element aspect ratio
  •  Effect of geometrical distortion of shell element from rectangular
  •  Joint force loading
  • No labels