Excerpt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This object serves multiple purposes, including defining unfactored result cases for AASHTO-based combinations, filtering staged construction results by load type, extracting incremental/cumulative results from staged construction analysis, and combining transient loads such as wind loads, live loads to identify the most critical load effects. The main purpose of this section is to prepare Staged Construction Analysis results for AASHTO-based combinations. Most of the auto-generated transient loads, such as wind load on the structure, wind load on live load, and live load definitions, automatically generate their result extraction cases and can be directly used in limit states. However, for other loads, such as construction loads or temperature loads, the user must define a case here. The Result Extraction Cases generated through this process will be utilized in the "Limit States" section. When selecting result cases from a Staged Construction Analysis, there are several options available to extract results : Incremental[Yes/No]: If "no" is selected, the cumulative results from the selected stage will be extracted. If "yes" is selected, the incremental results from the selected stage will be extracted. 1.Result Extraction Method from Stages[Cumulative/Incremental]: Users can choose either 'Cumulative' or 'Incremental'. When the 'Cumulative' option is chosen, the 'Filter by Load Type' column will be activated, allowing cumulative results to be filtered based on load types. This will include all prior stages as well as the results of the selected stage. For example, if you are analyzing a structure that has been loaded in multiple stages—say, first with dead loads and then with wearing surface loads—choosing 'Cumulative' will give you the total effect of all these loads combined up to the current stage. In contrast, selecting 'Incremental' would show only the effect of the wearing surface load applied in the current stage, without considering the dead loads applied in previous stages. So, for example, with this logic, the below selection will lead to unexpected results since the DW stage includes all force effects, including dead and imposed loads, as they are not filtered by load type However, when you select the incremental effect from that stage directly as seen below, if the wearing surface is a load applied in only one stage, it will be the correct selection. Please check the table below to understand the difference between incremental and cumulative result extraction with numbers.
2.Filter By Load Type[None/Dead Load/Imposed Dead ….]: Since different load types may exist in a particular stage, narrowing down the results by load type may be necessary. If the "Filter By Load Type" option is set to "None," the component will extract the incremental or cumulative results from the selected stage without filtering it according to them by load types. However, if it is set to "Dead Load," the component will extract only the incremental or cumulative dead load results and exclude other load types, such as imposed dead or wearing surface results loads, from the selected stage. This option filters the results according to the by load type. It is , making it crucial to ensure that the correctly assign load types are correctly assigned to the stages for accurate results result extraction. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Result Extraction | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction Stage | Prior Construction Stage | Load Type | Incremental Result Extraction | Cumulative Result Extraction filter by Dead Load | Cumulative Result Extraction filter by Imposed Dead Load | Cumulative Result Extraction filter by Wind Load | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SubstrConstStage | NULL | Dead | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GirderStage | SubstrConstStage | Dead | 30 | 55 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SIPFormworkStage | GirderStage | Dead | 12 | 67 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cast1PourStage | SIPFormworkStage | Dead | 28 | 95 | 0 | 0 | Cast2PourStage | Cast1PourStage | Dead | 128 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cast3PourStage | Cast2PourStage | Dead | 30 | 158 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cast123GainStiffStage | Cast3PourStage | Change | 0 | 158 | 0 | 0 | Cast4PourStage | Cast123GainStiffStage | Dead | 187 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cast5PourStage | Cast4PourStage | Dead | 31 | 218 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cast45GainStiffStage | Cast5PourStage | Change | 0 | 218 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FBarrierStage | Cast45GainStiffStage | Imposed Dead | 18 | 218 | 18 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FutureWearingStage | FBarrierStage | Wearing Surface | 26 | 218 | 18 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LLStage | FutureWearingStage | Live (Vehicular + Impact) | 40 | 218 | 18 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WSStage | FutureWearingStage | Wind on Structure | 32 | 218 | 18 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TUExpStage | FutureWearingStage | Temperature | 18 | 218 | 18 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TUContrStage | FutureWearingStage | Temperature | 16 | 218 | 18 | 0 | BRStage | FutureWearingStage | Braking | 218 | 18 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CentStage | FutureWearingStage | Centrifugal | 10 | 218 | 18 | 0 |
Construction Stages | Prior Construction Stage | Load Type | Cumulative Results Filter By Load Type ‘None’ Force Z(kip) | Cumulative Results Filter By Load Type ‘Dead Load’ Force Z (kip) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Deck Pouring 4 | Deck Hardening 1-2-3 | Dead | 7160 | 7160 |
Deck Pouring 5 | Deck Pouring 4 | Dead | 7610 | 7610 |
Deck Hardening 4-5 | Deck Pouring 5 | Change | 7610 | 7610 |
Barrier Construction | Deck Hardening 4-5 | Imposed Dead | 8150 | 7610 |
Future Wearing Loads | Barrier Construction | Wearing Surface | 8720 | 7610 |
Once results are extracted from a staged construction analysis using the incremental and filter by load type options, the envelope and extreme effect options Transient / Permanent Loads and Combination Method columns can be used to specify how further define the combination of results will be combined in a combination.Envelope[Yes/No]: If the "Envelope" option is set to "Yes," .
3.Transient/Permanent Loads [Transient/Permanent]: For permanent loads, this column’s input should be set to ‘Permanent’. However, for transient loads, such as temperature effects, the option ‘Transient’ should be used.
Selecting this option as ‘Transient’ will neglect the selected result case from the combination if its value in the enveloped column is positive results for minimum envelopes or negative results for maximum envelopes. For example, if a live load produces a positive moment in a beam, and the ‘Transient’ setting is applied, this result could be excluded from the minimum moment combination.
Note |
---|
Choosing ‘Transient’ for permanent loads may lead to incorrect results, as the result may be excluded from the maximum or minimum calculations. |
4.Stages | Factors: By clicking the three dots and selecting 'Edit,' another spreadsheet opens, allowing the user to determine the stage(s) that will be used in the extraction cases. Additionally, factors to modify the FEA results can be defined.
Note |
---|
Additional points to consider when defining result extraction cases for live loads(LL), braking loads(BR), centrifugal loads(CE), wind load on structure(WS), and wind load on live load(WL)
|
5.Combination Method[Linear/Envelope(Critical)]: This option can only be selected when two or more stages are involved in the ‘Stages Factors’ column. If multiple stages are involved, you can set this to either "Envelope (Critical)" or "Linear."
If the "Envelope (Critical)" option is selected, the component will find the critical case from the cases specified in the "Cases Stages and Factors" column . However, if only one result case is defined in this column, selecting "Yes" or "No" for the envelope will not affect the results. For example, when dealing with temperature loads, there are usually two cases to consider: expansion and contraction. The user has the option to add these cases to for each extracted result.
Example:
Suppose you are analyzing a structure with multiple stations along its length, each subjected to various loading conditions.
At Station 10, Case 1 might produce the highest bending moment, making it the critical case for bending moment at that location.
At Station 20, however, Case 2 might generate the highest axial force, making it the critical case for axial force at that station.
Furthermore, within the same station:
Case 1 could be critical for axial force.
Case 2 could be critical for bending moment.
When the "Envelope (Critical)" option is selected, the component automatically determines the most critical case for each result type (e.g., bending moment, axial force) at each station. This ensures that the most significant effects are captured and used in the combinations, regardless of which case produces them.
Consider the following scenarios:
Temperature Loads: Typically, temperature loads involve two cases—expansion and contraction. The user can add these cases to a single result extraction case and choose the
"Envelope" option as "Yes
"
to find the critical case.
Deck Pouring Sequence for Constructability Checks: The deck pouring process may consist of multiple stages
, with some stages exhibiting a maximum bending moment greater than that of the final stage. To
capture these maximum values, the user can combine all deck pouring stages into a single result extraction case and select the
"Envelope" option as "Yes" to
determine and utilize the critical
stage.
Important Note: If you are combining deck pouring results with live load cases for strength and serviceability checks, choosing the envelope option for each deck pouring stage is not appropriate. You should choose the final deck pouring stage for these checks. The envelope option is more suited for constructability checks, such as those involving wind loads.
Both examples are illustrated in the screenshot below.
If the "EnvelopeCombination Method" option is set to "NoLinear," the linear result combinations will operate by summing the results of multiple cases specified in the "Cases and Stages Factors" column. Factors can be applied to the cases to achieve a weighted linear combination, but it is recommended to increase the loads according to the factors defined in AASHTO under limit states partthe Limit States section. These factors should only be used if any increase needs is needed to be made to compute the unfactored loads, such as including splice and other steel girder attachments by increasing the dead load by 5 percent. However, if only one result case is defined in this column, selecting "Yes" or "No" for the envelope will not affect the results.Extreme Effects(Transient Loads)[Yes/No]: Selecting this option will exclude the selected result case from the combination if its value in the enveloped column is positive for minimums or negative for maximums. It is recommended to select "No" for permanent loads(Dead, Wearing Surface…) and "Yes" for transient loads(Temperature, Wind on Structure, Wind on Live, Live Load, Braking, Centrifugal…). Choosing EE=Yes for permanent loads may lead to incorrect results since the result may be excluded from the maximum or minimum results..
Results Based On Construction Stages | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Construction Stage | Prior Construction Stage | Load Type | Incremental Results Force Z (kip) | Cumulative Results Force Z (kip) | Cumulative Results filter by Dead Load Force Z (kip) |
Substructure Construction | NULL | Dead | 4140 | 4140 | 4140 |
Girder,Cross Frame, Bracing Construction | Substructure Construction | Dead | 800 | 4940 | 4940 |
Formwork Stage | Girder,Cross Frame, Bracing Construction | Dead | 280 | 5220 | 5220 |
Deck Pouring 1 | Formwork Stage | Dead | 500 | 5720 | 5720 |
Deck Pouring 2 | Deck Pouring 1 | Dead | 490 | 6210 | 6210 |
Deck Pouring 3 | Deck Pouring 2 | Dead | 500 | 6710 | 6710 |
Deck Hardening 1-2-3 | Deck Pouring 3 | Change | 0 | 6710 | 6710 |
Deck Pouring 4 | Deck Hardening 1-2-3 | Dead | 450 | 7160 | 7160 |
Deck Pouring 5 | Deck Pouring 4 | Dead | 450 | 7610 | 7610 |
Deck Hardening 4-5 | Deck Pouring 5 | Change | 0 | 7610 | 7610 |
Barrier Construction | Deck Hardening 4-5 | Imposed Dead | 540 | 8150 | 7610 |
Future Wearing Loads | Barrier Construction | Wearing Surface | 570 | 8720 | 7610 |
Temparture (Expansion) | Future Wearing Loads | Temperature | 5 | 8725 | 7610 |
Temparture (Contraction) | Future Wearing Loads | Temperature | -5 | 8720 | 7610 |
Wind Load on Structure | Future Wearing Loads | Wind on Structure | 0 | 8720 | 7610 |
Wind Load on Live Load | Future Wearing Loads | Wind on Live | 0 | 8720 | 7610 |