Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Object Link: https://openbrim.org/objidqy5k37frzawgdwjugvidp.libobj

The independent results are hand calculated using the unit load method described on page 244 in Cook and Young 1985. In addition, the torsional stiffness of the section, J, is calculated using item 4 in Table 20 on page 290 in Roark and Young 1975. Independent results are also published in MacNeal and Harder 1985.


COMPARISION

Load Case And TypeModel And Element ShapeOutput ParameterOpenBrIMSAP2000Independent

Percent Difference

(SAP2000 vs Independent)

Percent Difference

(OpenBrIM vs Independent)


Load Case 1

Axial Extension



A- Rectangle



Ux

Average of jts 7 and 14

in

xa1: 0.000030.00003



0.00003
 0.00%

 xa1: 0.00%

B - Trapezoidxb1: 0.000030.00003 0.00%xb1: 0.00%
C - Parallelogramxc1: 0.000030.00003 0.00%xc1: 0.00%
D - Triangle 2xd1: 0.000030.00003 0.00%xd1: 0.00%
E – Triangle 4xe1: 0.000030.00003 0.00%xe1: 0.00%



Load case 2
In-plane shear and bending

A- Rectangle



Uz
Average of jts 7 and 14

in

za2: 0.097680.1072




0.1081



-1%za2: -9.64%
B - Trapezoidzb2: 0.088170.0227-79%zb2: -18.44%
C - Parallelogramzc2: 0.097550.0804-26%zc2: -9.76%
D - Triangle 2zd2: 0.115730.0032-97%zd2: 7.06%
E – Triangle 4ze2: 0.008650.0066-94%ze2: -92.00%


Load case 3
Out-of-plane shear and bending


A- Rectangle


Uy
Average of jts 7 and 14

in

ya3: 0.432000.4320



0.43210
0%ya3: 0%
B - Trapezoidyb3: 0.432270.43220%yb3: 0%
C - Parallelogramyc3: 0.432190.43220%yc3: 0%
D - Triangle 2yd3: 0.428440.4296-1%yd3: -1%
E – Triangle 4

ye3: 0.42900

0.43140%ye3: -1%

...